There is little to nothing new in these new relaunches, except that the Liberals are attempting to work more in concert, behind the scenes, with each other -- in order to put forward a "united" Democratic front.
In re feministas, I'll provide a few of the many salient features in the news:
Hillary Rodham Clinton criticizes Bush abortion stance
The Bush administration's policy of withholding aid from overseas groups that perform abortions is hurting women and forcing clinics to close, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday.
First off, let me refer you to another post of mine about "countries needing to invite the US in" versus the US forcing itself upon others.
Fascinating. BC [Bill Clinton speaking at Davos with Charlie Rose] thinks we are not doing enough; however, BC is "hopeful" in re US approving in mass producing of generic (AIDS/HIV) drugs. "If a country asks, we go in". Appears, countries are NOT asking us to come in; but BC thinks we are not doing enough
I do remember the Beijing Women's Conference. The dance at the conference was concerning "human rights", meaning, for females (equality), and the dance was around "abortion as a human right). Many countries stand firmly opposed to abortion as a birth control measure. These representatives were loudly hooted, jeered, and disrespected by none other than the Hillary Clinton Cabal (then, and recently); and so the "abortion-as-a-human-rights" issue was lain on the table, for the time. (My system is messed up; so slow I'll relook for better "1995" articles when my system is in order).
On Monday, 03-07-05, Mrs. Hillary Clinton touted in a speech: the ethical standards of female leaders like herself on Monday, telling a forum at New York University that women in government are less corrupt than their male counterparts.
and then even more recently, the MSM brings us this:
Domestic violence toward women: Recognize the patterns and seek help
For those unacquainted with the feminist leviathan: all of the above, plus even more news such as "China having newer weapons and subs", plus the UN "women's funding" for abortion is on the table, add to the fact that VAWA is up again for a vote -- means "feminism" is relaunching itself via "international" socialist bodies.
Click here and here for my hard-earned, experiential analyses on so-called "domestic violence"
Domestic violence. Think about it. 9-11 was about "domestic violence". Meaning, on our shores -- NOT ABROAD.
Domestic violence, as coined by the socialists: Can there be worse abuse than a woman committing murder within her own body? Could it get "more" domestic than this????
The feminist leviathan is about politics. Domestic, and Abroad.
In years past, any responsible politician who did NOT support the feminist leviathan was tarred and feathered by the MSM as being "anti-woman". This is rhetorical blackmail. It is "soft abuse" via politics.
I do not support "abortion" as a human rights issue. First off, it is stupid. The baby is life; and its rights are not at all considered. Second, if a man is forced into paying child support, why has he no quarter on whether or not his wife can have an abortion. The entire feminist leviathan is a trap. It abuses the civil rights and due process in constitutional law of MEN.
It is used as a "stick" to beat others into submission.
Conclusion for now: Yes, the liberals worldwide are relaunching. They are activating their usual platforms, vis a vis, their particular org charter. It is "center-to-fringe"; not "fringe-to-center".
The showdown is coming, and the Socialists will lose. The world has awakened, and the Socialists are yet in denial.
Oh, yes... there's much more. Just a heads up; and don't be taken in by a political campaign masquerading as "sensitive to women's plight". Laws created by feminists serve, ultimately, to weaken women and make them dependent upon government while the same laws abuse the civil rights of men, while children are "mere props" in this political gamesmanship manuevering by Socialists, Domestic and Abroad.
Basically, what it amounts to is this, in my HUMBLE opinion: Feminists and Socialists of the world? Kiss my patooty: I don't accept your definitions of: Human. Human Rights. Life. Equality. Violence. Assault. Fairness. Quotas. LAWS.
Now... there's yer sign..
***************UPDATE*********
An excellent article by Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., entitled "Promises to keep?"
In ancient times, the men who hunted birds were called “fowlers.” They used a method of hiding behind their horses until they got close enough to capture their prey. That’s where we get our phrase “stalking horse.” The horse out front is meant to deceive –– behind it lurks an unseen threat. Today, at the U.N., there are yet fowlers among us. They are hiding behind horses named Beijing, CEDAW and UNIFEM. Our job, as Americans at this time, is to expose those “stalking horses” lest we be caught in the fowler’s snare.
Janice Crouse trained a team of NGOs who attended the Beijing Conference and she wrote a Beijing Bulletin about the daily activities at the conference. She also attended and wrote about Beijing +5, and is at the United Nations for Beijing +10, where she is writing and reporting on the negotiations for Concerned Women for America, the nation’s largest public policy women’s organization and an accredited NGO at the United Nations.
No comments:
Post a Comment