In a 3-page manifesto, the 104th archbishop of Canterbury (and leader of the Church of England) asserts that gays should NOT be criticized as it may encourage wrath and violence against homosexuals.
What a bloomin' idjit.
He's just said that homosexuals are not like anyone else.
And in this day and age when individualness is not encouraged; but rather "groupism"; all he's doing is drawing a red bull's eye on homosexuals with this kinda of blather.
Years back, the taboo was gayness. And in the libertine age of sexualism (60s, 70s), it became a badge of "anti-taboo honor" to have same-sex relations. NOW, the unawesome archbishop of Canterbury is suggesting that to criticize gays/lesbians is "bad". As you read this, right now review in your mind, all the various group-identity clans (blacks, gays, feminists, blah de blah) who get off on screwing taboos! In many ways, "screw the establishment" is para-writ for "screw a taboo". Ergo, the idjit has just encouraged these "taboo-drones" to mess with his own proclamation.
My question is, actually (and despite how the man has bastardized scripture which is, in fact, a cardinal sin): Is he for gays? Does he think he's helping them? His skinsdeep, superficial pretense to logic couldn't be more wrongheaded.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment