Alternative media platforms - talk radio, the Internet and this op-ed page - have spread these facts like kudzu. But the persistent media double standard is obvious to everyone but the manure spreaders at CNN: Had GOP candidates somehow been able to insert their operatives and supporters into a Democratic debate, and had, say, Fox News failed to vet the questioners and presented them as average citizens, both Fox and the GOP would be treated as the century’s worst media sinners.
I have yet the photos from San Francisco's "Fight the Right" march in the early 90s. If anyone had a real clue as to HOW MANY OF THOSE PROTESTORS WERE FUNDED, AND BROUGHT IN FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE US......................................................
They'd understand why "things" cost so much in the US and why the Democrats love "taxes".
Colleges were using obscure sounding "funds" to fund liberal activists from all over the country to MARCH in that parade. Unions were using "special" dues funds to PAY for union activists from all over the country to MARCH in that parade. Ad nauseum.
And the newspapers, in cahoots, and because they most CERTAINLY KNOW what and how these large groups are funded and "show up" -- presented the March as a "gathering of the voices of the people" of...... San Francisco.
When you pay tuition at colleges, are you also paying for some other students "right" to march in a parade of which you would actively protest against? Ya. How about the high pay of Union Workers.. those with "guaranteed jobs"? When a bridge gets built by union workers, are you also paying those high prices through your taxes in order to pay for some Union Activist's activism elsewhere around the country?
And the newspapers know this. I performed experiments in the early/mid 90s. I would go to liberal activist events. 1. As myself. I'd get handed literature. 2. Posing as a Press Person. I'd get handed amazing packages not available to the Average Jane.
The Established Media knows. And they, and the Clintons knew in advance.
And now they're all playing so innocent because, they've gotten away with these stunts in the Established Media for DECADES, and are "angry" because.. well, they've gotten away with such deception all these years, how DARE anyone not considered "elite" challenge the established practice of the elite.
How DARE they.
And herein lies the answer as to why those like the Clintons never exhibit shame, remorse, etc. It's because they feel that they are acting "appropriately" and in "conforming" with the established practices practiced for decades and of which they and their Stalinist pals have set into motion all these past years.
How DARE anyone disagree. Why... how "uncivil".